Politics by Other Means

by Michael Hopping

If the widely circulated photograph of last month’s
anti-government demonstration in Washington, DC could be believed,
protesters jammed the National Mall all the way from the Capitol to the
Washington Monument.

“9/12” instigator and FoxNews host Glenn Beck was joined by other
conservative pundits in estimating the crowd at 1,000,000-2,000,000.
Impressive if true, but of course it wasn’t.

This photo is from the 1997 Promise Keeper’s rally. The crowd gathered for the anti-government demonstration only filled the area between the Capitol steps and Third Street, the area around the reflecting pool.

The supposed photographic evidence dated from the 1997 Promise Keeper’s
rally. Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checker Politifact.com
(www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2009/sep/14/tea-party-photo-shows-large-crowd-different-event/)
quoted the public affairs officer for the D.C. Fire and Emergency
Department as saying that the crowd filled only the area between the
Capitol steps and Third Street, the area around the reflecting pool.
The grounds of the Washington Monument begin around 15th Street. The
same official guesstimated attendance at 60,000-75,000.

So it seems that conservative claims were a bit inflated – by 2,000 percent.

The Politics of Dirty Pool

We’re getting used to it. We’ve been fed fake Kenyan birth
certificates, euthanasia scares, and charges that Democrats might use
voter IDs to deny Republicans medical treatment. Or that rationing
decisions could be based on age or race.

Similar tactics, dubbed the “kitchen sink” strategy, were employed
against then candidate Barack Obama during the 2008 election cycle.
Opponents propagated attacks, no matter how outrageous or unsupported,
and continued any that generated media coverage or heightened public
fear. A steady barrage of new charges distracted attention from the
exposure of previous falsehoods. Then and now the result is a
derailment of responsible debate.

If confusion and fear stalemate Washington or gut Democratic proposals,
government looks incompetent. Republicans figure that sabotage is a
winner — and that the party can shut down conservative mayhem when it
re-takes power.

The Obama administration is only now beginning to grasp this stark
reality and has yet to devise an effective means of coping with it.
Let’s step back and see conservative strategy for what it is: the
intellectual equivalent of guerrilla war. Inflammatory charges take the
place of roadside bombs, but the effect is similar. A nation is
prevented from conducting its business. People suffer. Conservative
leaders hope that popular sentiment will hold the government, not them,
responsible.

Insurgencies are relatively small and mobile; governments are not.
President Obama’s advisors face many of the same problems as our
generals in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Insurgents cast denunciations of their activity — or prosecution of
Bush officials they supported in office — as tyrannical. Thankfully, so
far, progressives and Democrats have largely resisted the temptation to
retaliate in kind: moral high ground is worth preserving. But failure
to respond to Republican charges appears weak, as does an
administration chronically playing defense against hit-and-run foes.

Constitutional Challenges

Wild claims and charges represent only the most polite aspects of the
conservative attack. Tea Party sympathizers in several states are
attempting to gin up confrontations between states and the federal
government.

Thirty-seven state legislatures have considered or adopted “State
Sovereignty” resolutions (www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/), which claim
state authority “over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted
to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.”
One of Sarah Palin’s last gubernatorial acts was signing an Alaska
sovereignty resolution; a North Carolina resolution, HR 849, died in
committee this year.

In essence these resolutions set states up for a wholesale
“nullification” of federal mandates in areas not specified by the
Constitution. But in fact our nation fought a Civil War over that
interpretation of the Tenth Amendment; a century later presidents
Eisenhower and Kennedy used National Guard troops to counter it in the
segregated South.

But conservatives are eager to have another go. Six states are taking
steps to block “national healthcare” mandates in their states, as in
Arizona.
(www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/06/26/arizona-hcr2014-national-health-care-nullification/)
Some Georgia legislators propose the same. Oklahoma drew a Justice
Department threat to withhold federal funds for making English the
official state language. Tennessee and Montana passed laws exempting
firearms made and used within those states from federal gun laws. The
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives sent letters to
holders of federal firearms licenses reaffirming that federal law still
applies.
(www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/08/06/obamas-imperial-decree-target-oklahoma/)

Texas governor Rick Perry went further, dropping hints about Texas
independence at a teabag demonstration this spring.
(www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1891829,00.html) A Daily Kos
poll (www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/4/22/TX/288) found Texas
Republicans evenly split on whether Texas would be better off as an
independent nation.

Bullets and Blood

Earlier this year Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano endured a
firestorm over an intelligence report
(www.splcenter.org/images/dynamic/main/homeland_extremism_0409.pdf) on
domestic rightwing terrorism. The assessment, begun during the previous
administration, concluded that “lone wolves and small terrorist cells
embracing violent rightwing extremist ideology are the most dangerous
domestic terrorism threat in the United States.”

Republican lawmakers and conservative media personalities had a telling
response to the Homeland Security intelligence assessment. They
attacked Napolitano and grossly misrepresented the report. House
minority leader Rep. John Boehner was quoted
(www.democracynow.org/2009/4/24/rise_of_right_wing_extremism_linked) as
saying the assessment applies to, “about two-thirds of Americans who
might go to church, who may have served in the military, who may be
involved in community activities… I just don’t understand how our
government can look at the American people and say, ‘You’re all
potential terrorist threats.’”

In fact, though, the radical right has a robust history of violence
against people. Domestic hate groups, mostly right wing, are
proliferating, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. There were
926 hate groups in 2008, up from 602 eight years before.
(www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=1027)

•    The 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City remains
the deadliest homegrown act of terrorism in US history. The bomber was
a combat veteran of Operation Desert Storm.
•    Sales of guns and ammunition have boomed since it became apparent
that Obama might win the White House. Assault rifles and handguns are
especially popular. Citizens carrying guns have appeared outside
presidential speaking engagements.
•    Radical conservative military and law enforcement personnel are
organizing, half-underground, to support guns and state sovereignty.
The Oath Keepers (www.oath-keepers.blogspot.com/) swear to refuse
orders they believe to conflict with the Constitution.

Right-wing violence may not be limited to isolated lone wolf shooters
and secret militias much longer. The National Association of Rural
Landowners, (www.narlo.org/), a bronze-level organizational sponsor of
the 9/12 March on Washington, threatens overthrow of the federal
government in a video titled “The Coming Civil War.”
(www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5Ewwmikc9Q)

A Battle for the National Soul

The shame of this for ordinary Americans is paralysis of government at
a time when our country has serious problems. None of them, including
legitimate conservative concerns, can be effectively addressed until
the insurgency at all levels is neutered. Liberals can fight
conservatives but can’t clean house for them.

Conservative heavyweight William F. Buckley recognized a similar
problem with the radical right in the early 1960s. He read the John
Birch Society and like-minded extremists out of conservatism. Until we
see the like of Buckley again, all conservative and Republican charges
and claims should be treated as bad faith efforts to sabotage the
United States — until proven otherwise.